After Fatal Crash, Drugs Found in 3 on Railroad Crew

The three people involved in a fatal Amtrak crash near Philadelphia last April tested positive for drug use — the train’s engineer and two members of a railway work crew who both were killed, according to federal investigators.

The engineer, Alexander Hunter, 48, who survived the crash, had used marijuana, investigators said. A backhoe operator, Joseph Carter Jr., 61, had used cocaine, testing showed. The supervisor of the work crew, Peter John Adamovich, 59, had used oxycodone, according to test results.

Carter and Adamovich were killed when a southbound passenger train traveling at 106 mph struck the backhoe as it was doing work to maintain an adjacent track, the National Transportation Safety Board said after the April 3 crash in Chester, Pa.

The three positive drug tests were part of an alarming increase in drug use by railroad workers that was documented last year by the Federal Railroad Administration. Nearly 5 percent of workers involved in accidents in 2016 were found to have used illegal drugs.

The railroad agency reacted to the Chester crash by requiring that track-bed maintenance workers be included in the extensive drug-testing program that has been in place for train crew members for more than 30 years.

The fatal accident between Amtrak’s Palmetto train, with 330 passengers and seven crew members, and a backhoe being operated by Carter under Adamovich’s supervision, took place early on a Sunday morning. The southbound train departed Philadelphia’s 30th Street Station at 7:32 a.m. and was gathering speed about 18 minutes later as it began to pass through Chester.

A huge cleaning machine had been sitting all weekend on track No. 2, one of four tracks that pass through the area. That track had been shut down for the maintenance work. Carter and Adamovich had positioned their backhoe on track No. 3, the one which Hunter’s train was roaring down upon.
Hunter told investigators he pulled the train’s emergency brake after “seeing something” on track No. 3, but it was too late to avoid the crash.

“Then, you know, once I realized like — I knew — like, I could see, like when I got closer, that [the backhoe] was pretty well onto my track and I — you know, I knew I was going to hit him,” Hunter told the safety board’s investigators two days after the accident. “I could feel the train lift up, and … I just kind of curled up in a ball in the deck of the locomotive and waited for it to stop.”

The engine derailed but remained upright. Hunter and 40 people on board were taken to hospitals with minor injuries. Release of the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigative docket Thursday will be followed at an as yet undetermined date by the board’s finding of probable cause for the accident. (The safety board concluded that a post-accident test that found morphine in Adamovich was the result of the drug being administered when he was taken to a hospital emergency room.)

The Federal Railroad Administration knew by April that drug use among railroad workers was on the rise, but when tests on Carter, Adamovich and Hunter came back positive, alarm bells went off.

In 2014, no one tested positive for drug use after a rail accident. In 2015, there were just two post-accident positives.
Railroad workers are among the most heavily drug-tested in the country, faced with drug screening before they are hired, random on-the-job testing and another round of testing every time they make a significant mistake.

After several years in which heroin and illegal opioid use had increased in the general population, it was evident that use of those and other drugs was on the rise in the railroad industry.

In approximately 50,000 random tests each year, there had been no appreciable increase since 2009. But that changed abruptly in 2015: random tests of railway workers — including engineers, train crew and dispatchers — found drug use had soared by 43 percent.

Sarah Feinberg, chief of the Federal Railroad Administration at the time, reacted swiftly to that news. She summoned the heads of the nation’s passenger and freight lines to a private session in Washington last year, laying out her concerns and asking for their help in combating the swelling problem.

Feinberg had a similar meeting with rail union leaders, and then relayed her concerns to the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee. She also issued a rule requiring maintenance workers like Carter and Adamovich be added to the list of railroad employees subject to drug testing.

When the railroad industry asked for a one-year delay in the testing program — saying they were concerned over whether it covered contract workers — Feinberg denied the request.

Feinberg also instigated a decertification process against Hunter that would prevent him from operating a train again. Federal regulators generally defer to the railroad in such situations, allowing it to discipline or fire workers after positive drug tests. But that process can become entangled in union contact rules, so the Federal Railroad Administration moved ahead with decertifying him to ensure he could not operate a train again.

Hunter spent 17 years operating trains, most of that time with New Jersey Transit, followed by two years at Amtrak. When asked if he was still with the railroad, Amtrak responded with a statement that said: “Drug use in the workplace at Amtrak is unacceptable and is not tolerated,” but did not respond to that direct question.
A Section on 01/28/2017


Because an employee has greater access to your resources, they are 15 times more likely than a non-employee to steal from you. This loss lessens your competitive edge; it also threatens to put you in the one-third of all business failures that happen due to employee theft.



Owners Jim & Leeanne Mills envisioned making business owners’ lives easier by taking Background Screening, Drug Screening, & Job Applicant Assessment burdens off their plates.

After 21 years of Naval service riding nuclear submarines, we traded in our Navy life and then we worked in the For-Profit Education Industry hiring employees, managers & professors. While hiring new employees our experience using the available Background Check Process proved to be a very time consuming, challenging, frustrating and difficult one.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]